Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. HebertFaustina Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert
Versions:
Lead Opinion
In re Faustina Pipe Line Co.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number 84-459; Parish of Lafayette 15th Judicial District Court Div. “H” Number 83-0760.
Prior report:
Denied.
Dissenting Opinion
would grant the writ on the issue of severance damages. The mere existence of a pipeline absent any eviden-tiary support of damage will not support an award for severance damages. Furthermore, encasement costs of a pipeline under unplanned streets in an imaginary subdivision is speculative.