midpage

Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. HebertFaustina Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 20, 1985
No. 85-C-1215
Versions:

Lead Opinion

In re Faustina Pipe Line Co.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number 84-459; Parish of Lafayette 15th Judicial District Court Div. “H” Number 83-0760.

Prior report: 469 So.2d 483.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.





Dissenting Opinion

BLANCHE, J.,

would grant the writ on the issue of severance damages. The mere existence of a pipeline absent any eviden-tiary support of damage will not support an award for severance damages. Furthermore, encasement costs of a pipeline under unplanned streets in an imaginary subdivision is speculative.

Case Details

Case Name: Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Sep 20, 1985
Citations: 474 So. 2d 1295; No. 85-C-1215
Docket Number: No. 85-C-1215
Court Abbreviation: La.
Log In