Fasenmyer v. State
413 So. 2d 33 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1981
Upon our review of the complete record of appellant’s conviction for breaking and entering, we find insufficient admissible evidence of a breaking and that the highest offense sustained by the record on that charge is that of entering without breaking with intent to commit a felony. No error affects appellant’s other convictions. The breaking and entering judgment is therefore REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for entry of an appropriate judgment and for resentencing.
