| N.J. | Jun 15, 1886

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme' Court in its opinion.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Knapp, •Scudder, Brown, Clement, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 9.

For reversal—None.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.