History
  • No items yet
midpage
Farrell v. Greene
110 Vt. 92
Vt.
1938
Check Treatment

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover for the loss of the services of his minor daughter, Bernice Farrell, and for money expended for medical attendance upon her, due to injuries sustained by her being struck by an automobile driven by the defendant Greene. The trial court set aside the plaintiff's verdict and entered judgment for the defendant. *Page 93

The material facts are the same as in Bernice Farrell v.Greene, ante p. 87, 2 A.2d 194, in which we held that the plaintiff therein was contributorily negligent, and not entitled to recover. Since the contributory negligence of Bernice is a bar to this action brought by her parent (Tidd v. Skinner, 225 N.Y. 422, 122 N.E. 247, 3 A.L.R. 1145, 1151; Wueppeshall v.Connecticut Co., 87 Conn. 710, 89 A. 166), the decision in that case is conclusive in this.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Farrell v. Greene
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Nov 1, 1938
Citation: 110 Vt. 92
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.