Farnum v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurance on Lives

87 N.J. Eq. 652 | N.J. | 1917

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed' from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance—Garrison, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—13. For reversal—None.
midpage