157 N.W. 988 | S.D. | 1916
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to dissolve an attachment. The writ was issued upon an affidavit alleging:
“That the above-named defendant has assigned and disposed of property, and is1 about to assign, dispose of, and secrete his property, with intent bo* defraud creditors.”
The motion to dissolve was on the ground: First, that the affidavit does not state facts sufficient upon which to base the warrant of attachment; second, that the defendant -has not assigned nor disposed of any of his property with intent to defraud' his creditors, and that he is- not about to assign or dispose or secrete any of his property with .intent to defraud his creditors, or for any other purpose whatsoever. The first ground of motion, as discussed in appellant’s brief, is that the attachment affidavit does •not specify the grounds of the cause of action wherein the attach
At the hearing plaintiff offered1 no affidavits- or other evidence in denial or rebuttal of -the showng made by defendant. The trial court erred in its refusal to dissolve the- attachment. The affidavits- of defendant positively -denied the facts alleged in the-
The order of the trial court is reversed, with directions to the trial court to dissolve the attachment.