Farmer v. State, 535 So. 2d 358

PER CURIAM.

Farmer appeals a judgment and sentences, including the assessment of attorney’s fees and costs, which adjudicated him guilty of grand theft and resisting an officer. We affirm the judgment and sentences but strike the assessment of fees and costs.

Although Farmer raises six points on appeal, we find only one has merit. Farmer received no notice or hearing prior to the imposition of attorney’s fees and costs. These fees and costs are struck without prejudice for the state to seek reassessment in accordance with Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

The judgment and sentences are affirmed; the fees and costs are struck. Remanded with directions to the trial court.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Farmer v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Dec 28, 1988

Citations: 535 So. 2d 358; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 152; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5778; 1988 WL 139087; No. 87-115

Docket Number: No. 87-115

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.