History
  • No items yet
midpage
Farley v. . Buchmuller
218 N.Y. 658
| NY | 1916
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN and SEABURY, JJ. Dissenting: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK and CARDOZO, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Farley v. . Buchmuller
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 9, 1916
Citation: 218 N.Y. 658
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.