297 F. 198 | 9th Cir. | 1924
The plaintiff in error and Pat Bowes were jointly charged by information with violations of sections 3 and 21, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Bupp.
“A man cannot run a restaurant, and know that liquor is being sold by his waiters as people come in, and consent to it, and have knowledge of its going on, and then claim exemption because somebody else made the same.”
The bill of exceptions here contains the evidence only so far as it related to 'exceptions taken in the course of the trial. It does not purport to, and does not in fact, contain all of the testimony in the case. There is nothing in the record, therefore, upon which this court is authorized to say that there was no evidence to sustain a verdict against the plaintiff in error.
The judgment is affirmed.