Farinella v. Di'Chaira

100 N.J.L. 397 | N.J. | 1924

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chahcelloe, Teenchaed, Pakkee, Kalis ch, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaednee, Yah Buskiek, Claek, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.