Farerh v. Farerh

Oct 5, 1934
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Advisory Master Herr.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.