History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fanning v. State
537 So. 2d 197
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs and attorney fees without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments *198and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Fanning v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 20, 1989
Citation: 537 So. 2d 197
Docket Number: No. 87-1928
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.