midpage

Fanning v. StateFanning v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jan 20, 1989
No. 87-1928
Versions:537 So. 2d 197
14 Fla. L. Weekly 247
1989 WL 3275
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 210
PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs and attorney fees without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments *198and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Fanning v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 20, 1989
Citations: 537 So. 2d 197; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 247; 1989 WL 3275; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 210; No. 87-1928
Docket Number: No. 87-1928
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In