History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fairview Development Co. v. Fay
91 N.J.L. 687
N.J.
1918
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.

Case Details

Case Name: Fairview Development Co. v. Fay
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 31, 1918
Citation: 91 N.J.L. 687
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.