History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fairey v. Hildebrand
157 S.E. 841
S.C.
1931
Check Treatment

March 23, 1931. The opinion of the Court was delivered by It is well established that in a law case this Court will not disturb findings of fact of the probate Court, concurred in by the Circuit Court, when there is any evidence to support such findings. It is needless to cite any of the many authorities sustaining this proposition. There was evidence in this case to warrant the findings of fact of the Probate Judge, which were approved, on appeal by the Circuit Judge.

We find no error of law in the holdings of the Circuit Judge. The decree, which will be reported, is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, STABLER, CARTER and BONHAM concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Fairey v. Hildebrand
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Mar 23, 1931
Citation: 157 S.E. 841
Docket Number: 13097
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.