History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fairclough v. Baumgartner
84 A.2d 545
| N.J. | 1951
|
Check Treatment
8 N.J. 187 (1951)
84 A.2d 545

ELMER FAIRCLOUGH AND MARTHA FAIRCLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HERMAN BAUMGARTNER AND THERESA BAUMGARTNER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 12, 1951.
Decided November 19, 1951.

*190 Mr. J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Milton Schamach, attorney).

Mr. I. Arthur Weiss argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Weiss & Weiss, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Grimshaw.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Fairclough v. Baumgartner
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 19, 1951
Citation: 84 A.2d 545
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.