History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fabian v. Schenectady Rapid Transit, Inc.
245 A.D. 791
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. There is nothing in the newly-discovered evidence which would justify the conclusion that it would change the result if a new trial were granted. The same judge who presided at the trial heard the motion for a new trial and denied the application. The order appealed from is discretionary and should be affirmed. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Fabian v. Schenectady Rapid Transit, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1935
Citation: 245 A.D. 791
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.