History
  • No items yet
midpage
F. A. Sherrill & Co. v. Weisiger Clothing Co.
114 N.C. 436
N.C.
1894
Check Treatment

The authority of an agent to collect a note or bill does not authorize him to indorse the note or bill either in the name of his principal or on his own account, and the defendant's acquiescence in the approval of the sale, supposing it to be an out and (440) out sale simply, was not a ratification in fact of the unauthorized indorsement, of which he had no knowledge when he approved the sale. Hinesv. Butler, 38 N.C. 307. The attorney, prima facie, had no authority to sell and indorse and the plaintiff, under the circumstances of this case, should have inquired as to the extent of his authority. Earp v. Richardson,81 N.C. 5; Biggs v. Ins. Co., 88 N.C. 141; Smith, Cont., 311. There should be a

New trial.

Case Details

Case Name: F. A. Sherrill & Co. v. Weisiger Clothing Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 5, 1894
Citation: 114 N.C. 436
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.