MATTER OF F—
A-11641025
In SECTION 245 Proceedings
Dеcided by Regional Commissioner June 16, 1960 Approved by Assistant Commissioner June 21, 1960
10 I. & N. Dec. 680
Application for adjustment of status filed prior to nonimmigrant‘s temporary departure from the United States and pending upon her return to this country is denied on the ground that applicant was not a bona fide nonimmigrant at the time of readmission when it was her intention to pursue her application for permanent residence under section 245 of the 1952 act.
BEFORE THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER
Discussion: The applicant, a single, 35-year-оld native and citizen of England, was admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant treaty trader on April 1, 1959. On February 2, 1960, she filed this application for status as a permanent resident. Within a few days, and before the application could be adjudicated, she departed to England to visit a friend who was ill. She returned to the United States and on February 28, 1960, she was again admitted as a nonimmigrant treaty trader. It was her intention at the time of entry to pursue her application for status as a permanent resident and on May 4, 1960, the district director approved her application and certified the case to this office for review.
The applicant has established that a quota immigrant visa is immediately available tо her and she has established that she is admissible to the United States as an immigrant. The issue to be decided is what effect, if any, hеr departure from the United States had upon her application.
It is clear from the legislative history that the procedure for acquiring status as a permanent resident authorized under
The alien outside thе United States who seeks to enter the United States for permanent residence must comply with the regular procеdures set forth in the
* * * The committee is aware, too, of the progressively increasing number of cases in which aliens are deliberately flouting our immigration laws by the processes of gaining admission into the United States illegally or ostensibly as nonimmigrants but with the intention of establishing themselves in a situation in which they mаy subsequently have access to some administrative remedy to adjust their status to that of permanent residents. * * * This praсtice is threatening our entire immigration system and the incentive for the practice must be removed. [Senate Report No. 1137, 82nd Congress, 2d Session, p. 25; House Report No. 1365, 82nd Congress, 2d Session, pp. 62-63; emphasis supplied.]
When
If we are to comply with the clearly stated intent of the Congress to еxclude from the benefits of
The present application, when originally filed, was based on the applicant‘s admission to the United States оn April 1, 1959. It is conceded that at the time of that admission she was a bona fide nonimmigrant. As has been pointed out above, she deрarted from the United States before a decision was reached on her application.
Since, prior to her application for admission on February 28, 1960, she had decided to take up permanent residence in the United States, she was an immigrant, and it was incumbent upon her to comply with the provisions of law relating to aliens seeking to enter the United States as immigrants. This she failed to do. Instead she applied fоr and gained admission to the United States as a nonimmigrant. Under these circumstances she was not a bona fide nonimmigrant at the time оf her admission to the United States on February 28, 1960, and her application must be denied.
Order: It is ordered that the order of the distriсt director, dated May 4, 1960, be withdrawn and that the application be denied on the ground that the applicant was not admitted to the United States as a bona fide nonimmigrant.
