History
  • No items yet
midpage
661 F.3d 476
9th Cir.
2011

ORDER

The court invites supplemental briefs by any amicus curiae addressing the following questions: Does Stem v. Marshall, —U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011), prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance? If so, may the bankruptcy court hear the proceeding and submit a report and recommendation to a federal district court in lieu of entering a final judgment?

Any briefs responding to this order shall be filed no later than thirty days from the filed date of this order. All briefs shall *477 comply with the page or type-volume limitations specified in Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 29(d) and 32(a)(7). Any person or entity wishing to file a brief as an amicus curiae in response to this order is granted leave to do so pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a).

Case Details

Case Name: Executive Benefits Insurance v. Arkison (In Re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.)
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 4, 2011
Citations: 661 F.3d 476; 2011 WL 5307852; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22330; 11-35162
Docket Number: 11-35162
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In