History
  • No items yet
midpage
Executive Benefits Insurance v. Arkison (In Re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.)
661 F.3d 476
9th Cir.
2011
Check Treatment
Docket

ORDER

The court invites supplemental briefs by any amicus curiae addressing the following questions: Does Stem v. Marshall, —U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011), prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance? If so, may the bankruptcy court hear the proceeding and submit a report and recommendation to a federal district court in lieu of entering a final judgment?

Any briefs responding to this order shall be filed no later than thirty days from the filed date of this order. All briefs shall *477 comply with the page or type-volume limitations specified in Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 29(d) and 32(a)(7). Any person or entity wishing to file a brief as an amicus curiae in response to this order is granted leave to do so pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a).

Case Details

Case Name: Executive Benefits Insurance v. Arkison (In Re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.)
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 4, 2011
Citation: 661 F.3d 476
Docket Number: 11-35162
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.