History
  • No items yet
midpage
398 So. 2d 332
Ala.
1981

The Petitioner has not employed either ARAP 10 (f) or 39 (k) to present the issue he asserts. Therefore, the merits of his contention are not before us, and we are, therefore, compelled to deny his petition, 398 So.2d 320.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex Parte Watson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Feb 20, 1981
Citations: 398 So. 2d 332; 80-171
Docket Number: 80-171
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Ex Parte Watson, 398 So. 2d 332