History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex Parte Roberts
1832 U.S. LEXIS 468
SCOTUS
1832
Check Treatment
31 U.S. 216 (____)
6 Pet. 216

EX PARTE JOSEPH ROBERTS, AND
EX PARTE GEORGE ADSHEAD.

Supreme Court of United States.

*217 The motion for a mandamus was argued in writing by Mr Beardsley, as counsel for the claimants.

Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

The court is of opinion that the present is not a proper case for the interposition of this court, by way of mandamus. The application to set aside the default and inquest, was an application to the discretion of the district court; and is not distinguishable in principle from applications to grant new trials. This court has always considered such applications as resting in the sound discretion of the court where the cause is depending, and not a matter for a mandamus or writ of error.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex Parte Roberts
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 28, 1832
Citation: 1832 U.S. LEXIS 468
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.