History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex parte O'Neal
72 Ala. 560
Ala.
1882
Check Treatment
STONE, J.

The present record makes a case of great hardship, but it is beyond our power to relieve it. The petition fails to show that the petitioner was free from fault and neglect in failing to make his defense. When the chancery case was decided against him, that gave him notice that he had lost the lands for which the notes or bonds were given. Losing the lands, the'notes were without consideration. ITe should then have looked after the defense of the suit at law. The demurrer to his petition should have been sustained.—Ex parte Walker, 54 Ala. 577; Beadle v. Graham, 66 Ala. 102.

The writ of man dam us will be granted, commanding the Circuit Court of Madison county to set aside and vacate the order granting a rehearing, unless that court, on being informed of this ruling, itself make the order.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex parte O'Neal
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Dec 15, 1882
Citation: 72 Ala. 560
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.