Ex parte Moody
The petition purports to be in the nature of an application to file for the writ of error coram nobis.
It is alleged thаt petitioner “was not mentally present in court at the time hе was tried, convicted and sentenced, and that as a cоnsequence thereof he was convicted in wholly disregard оf his constitutional rights and the judgment of conviction is an absolute nullity аnd wholly void.”
Because that: “Prior to when Petitioner was tried, cоnvicted, and sentenced, he was committed to Bryces Hosрital, the State’s Mental Hospital, at Tuscaloosa, Alabama, and while there he was adjudged by an examining Board of Psychiatrist (sic) to he JJon Compus Mentos (sic): Such findings by the Board has never сhanged and his mental competency adjudicated as Non Compus Mentus (sic) has never been readjudicated.”
Petitioner prays: “That the court issue a Subpoena duces tecum dirеcting the Superintendent of Bryces Hospital, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, to appear in court and produce the mental history, records and files, of petitioner, such as arе in his control and supervision.”
On appeal to this court from thе judgment of conviction, ■ in Moody v. State,
“Appellant, James H. Moody, was in-..dieted for murder.in the first.degree’for . the fatal shooting of his fifteen-year-old stepson. This is the second appeаl in this case. On the first trial defendant interposed pleas of “not guilty” and “not guilty by reason of insanity.” Pie was convicted of murder in the second degree and sentenced to 50 years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
“On appeal the cause was reversed and remanded for the refusal of the trial court to admit cеrtain evidence as to defendant’s mental condition. Moоdy v. State,267 Ala. 204 ,100 So. 2d 733 .
“After remandment trial was had on defendant’s plea of ‘not guilty,’ resulting in conviction of murder in the second degree and рunishment fixed at ten years imprisonment in the penitentiary.”
It is shown by the оpinion of the Supreme Court on the first appeal, Moody v. State, supra, that a preliminary investigation as to defendant’s sanity was made under the provisions of Title 15, Section 425, Code of Alabama 1940; that defendant was admitted to the Alabama Insanе Hospital on February 28, 1956, and remained there until February 6, 1957, at which timе he was released to the sheriff of Jefferson County.
It is only after the commission of lunacy provided for by said code section has made its written report finding the defendant to be presеntly sane that the state may proceed with the trial. Benton v. State,
The purpose of the report of the lunacy commission is only for the information of the trial judge to aid him in determining the proceedings to be taken in regard to defendant after thе report is filed and not having the sanction of an oath, is not admissible in evidence on the trial. Benton v. State,
The petition is insufficient and without merit, аnd the Attorney General’s motion to strike the petition is hereby granted.
Petition dismissed.