midpage

Ex Parte Lundy

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 30, 1920
4 Div. 892.
Versions:85 So. 821
204 Ala. 492
1920 Ala. LEXIS 243
McCLELLAN, j.

The questions argued in the brief in support of the application for certiorari were correctly decided by the Court of. Appeals. 85 South. 819. The reference in the opinion of the Court of Appeals to the photograph of the deceased might be interpreted as casting doubt upon the correctness of the action of the trial court in admitting that photograph in evidence. The photo was properly received in evidence. Sanders v. State, 202 Ala. 37, 79 South. 375, 376.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex Parte Lundy
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 30, 1920
Citations: 85 So. 821; 204 Ala. 492; 1920 Ala. LEXIS 243; 4 Div. 892.
Docket Number: 4 Div. 892.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In