History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex parte Johnson
2 Paige Ch. 282
New York Court of Chancery
1830
Check Treatment
The Chancellor

decided that a retaining fee to solicitor and counsel was not allowable upon opposing a motion founded upon a petition for instructions to a receiver in the discharge of his duty. That like costs on a denial of the application must be taxed as are allowed for resisting a special motion. That on applications for commissions of lunacy, and other special proceedings of a like nature, where solicitors are actually employed to conduct the proceedings, a retaining fee ought to be allowed to the solicitor. But that retaining fees to counsel are only allowed where counsel are actually employed in a cause or suit strictly so called, in which ' there are adverse proceeding, or where there is a complainant and a defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex parte Johnson
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Jun 21, 1830
Citation: 2 Paige Ch. 282
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.