History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex parte Johnson
7 Cow. 424
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1827
Check Treatment
Curia.

We think the C. P. were right. The plaint was *425m- the nature of an original, which commands a summons; and, not being executed by notice to the party, -is no reason why the process should wholly fail. The second authority to summon the defendant was in nature of an alias. At any rate, calling it so in the rule, or elsewhere, will not vitiate it. The statute is merely directory to the sheriff. No doubt, it is his duty to summon the party, if he can. But if he fails to do "his duty, this is no reason why the plaintiff should lose his suit. The motion must be denied.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex parte Johnson
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1827
Citation: 7 Cow. 424
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.