Ex Parte Isaacs

Jun 26, 1895
No. 791.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Henderson
HENDERSON, Judge.

This was a proceeding on habeas corpus in which the appellant ivas charged with ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍murder. ’ The court, after a hearing of the case, remanded the applicant to the custody of the sheriff, without bail, and applicant prosecuted an appeal to this ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍court. What purports to be a statement of facts is a stenographic report of the evidence taken in the case, containing questions and answers throughout. This is in violation ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍of the rule prescribed by the Supreme Court for this court, and which has been adopted and followed by this court. See Emmons v. State, 34 Tex. Crim. ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍Rep., 98; Ratcliff v. State, 29 Tex. Crim. App., 249; Butler v. State, 33 Tex. Crim. Rep., 232. Because there is no proper statement of facts in the ‍​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍case, there is no evidence before us that can be considered. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.