History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex Parte Holmes Hutchinson v. Commissioners of the Canal Fund
25 Wend. 692
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1841
Check Treatment

By the Court,

Nelson, C. J.

It is sufficient to say that the statute vests the commissioners with a discretionary poioer to allow the claim, or such part thereof as they shall deem to be reasonable," if they shall be satisfied that the officers making such claim have been subjected to costs, &c., while’ acting in good faith in the discharge of their duty. Having a right thus to exercise a discretion in the matter, the remedy by mandamus is inappropriate. The legislature alone can revise the decision of the commissioners.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex Parte Holmes Hutchinson v. Commissioners of the Canal Fund
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1841
Citation: 25 Wend. 692
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.