217 So. 2d 826 | Ala. Ct. App. | 1969
This is an original proceeding filed here November 27, 1968. It is denominated "Petition to Reinstate Appeal."
September 20, 1966, Hoback gave in the Circuit Court his notice of appeal. No transcript of the record was ever filed here.
On March 7, 1967, said appeal was affirmed without opinion.
Sometime in 1968, Hoback brought a Federal habeas corpus action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. This led to an order releasing him on $2,500.00 bond pending prosecution of a coram nobis proceeding in the Jackson Circuit Court.
A transcription of the court reporter's notes on this evidentiary hearing has been filed by Hoback with the instant petition.
The matter therein which Hoback complains of is not amenable to coram nobis relief. Coram nobis relates to matters of fact which had they been presented in the original trial would have prevented the judgment of conviction.
All that was complained of (in the circuit court) relates to the failure of an appeal transcript to reach this court. This being post conviction, has nothing to do with the judgment of conviction.
"On the day of the call of each division set for the hearing of special motions the clerk will report to the court each case on the docket of that division in which the transcript has not been filed. If it appears that the time for filing such transcript, or any extension thereof, has not expired, the case will be continued. If the time for filing such transcript, or any extension thereof, has expired, a judgment of affirmance will be rendered. If supersedeas bond was made in the case, the judgment rendered will include *615 the penalty provided by statute. Such judgment may be set aside only for good cause shown upon petition, supported by affidavit, filed within fifteen days thereafter. Adversary counsel shall have at least five days' notice before the hearing of such petition. The granting of such petition may be upon such conditions as the court may impose, having due regard to the circumstances."
This rule is one of pragmatic performance. That is, the record must get here, whether transported by United States Mail, private carrier, toted in a lawyer's brief case or by St. Bernard dog, the means is of indifference. Gullatt v. State,
We find no power to revive this appeal.
Petition denied.