History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex Parte Brown
148 So. 132
Ala.
1933
Check Treatment

The United States Fidelity Guaranty Company, as surety upon the bond of O. B. Custer, guardian, filed a petition with Hon. Wm. M. Walker to remove the settlement of guardianship from the probate to the chancery court of Jefferson county. The petition was granted, and the petitioner here seeks a mandamus requiring said Walker to vacate the order of removal.

It is, of course, well settled that the probate and chancery courts have concurrent jurisdiction in guardianship settlements, and, as held in the recent case of Ex parte Chapman, 225 Ala. 168, 142 So. 540, that the surety on the guardian's bond, while an interested party, has no right to remove the settlement to the chancery court without averring a special equity. The question here is, Does the petition to Judge Walker aver a special or independent equity so as to differentiate this case from the Chapman Case, supra? It not only avers a fraudulent collusion between the two guardians and the ward to procure an unjust decree against the surety, the principal being insolvent, but also seeks a discovery and an accounting of numerous and complicated matters peculiar to the powers and jurisdiction of the chancery court.

The writ of mandamus is denied.

THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex Parte Brown
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: May 11, 1933
Citation: 148 So. 132
Docket Number: 6 Div. 331.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.