midpage

Ex Parte Brown

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 18, 1886
Versions:116 U.S. 401
6 S. Ct. 387
29 L. Ed. 676
1886 U.S. LEXIS 1775
Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This motion is denied. According to the petition, the court entertained jurisdiction of the cause, but dismissed it for want of due prosecution; that is to say, because errors had not been assigned in accordance with the rules of practice applicable to the form of.the action. This is a judgment which can only be reviewed by writ of error or appeal, as the case may be. Mandamus lies to compel a court to take jurisdiction in a proper case, but not to control its discretion while acting within its jurisdiction. This rule is elementary. Ex parte Morgan, 114 U. S. 174, and cases, cited.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex Parte Brown
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 18, 1886
Citations: 116 U.S. 401; 6 S. Ct. 387; 29 L. Ed. 676; 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1775
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In