midpage

Ex parte Botwinski

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 5, 1942
Versions:314 U.S. 586
62 S. Ct. 476
Per Curiam:

It does not appear that petitioner has exhausted his state remedies by applying for a writ of error coram nobis. State ex rel. Dowd v. Superior Court of La Porte County, 36 N. E. 2d 765; State ex rel. Kunkel v. Circuit Court of La Porte County, 209 Ind. 682, 200 N. E. 614. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice. Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex parte Botwinski
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 5, 1942
Citations: 314 U.S. 586; 62 S. Ct. 476
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In