History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex parte Botwinski
314 U.S. 586
SCOTUS
1942
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

It does not appear that petitioner has exhausted his state remedies by applying for a writ of error coram nobis. State ex rel. Dowd v. Superior Court of La Porte County, 36 N. E. 2d 765; State ex rel. Kunkel v. Circuit Court of La Porte County, 209 Ind. 682, 200 N. E. 614. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice. Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex parte Botwinski
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 5, 1942
Citation: 314 U.S. 586
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.