History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R.
279 U.S. 822
SCOTUS
1929
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

Upon examination of the returns to the nile to show cause, the Court finds that the reasons *823given by the respondent, the District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, that the case is likely to become moot, are not sufficient to justify his failure, immediately upon application, to call to his assistance, to hear and determine the application, two other judges, in accord with the provisions for direct review by this Court of the District Court, under § 4 of 238 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925, c. 229, 43 Stat. 936. See Virginian Ry. v. United States, 272 U. S. 658, 672. And the rule against the respondent is made absolute, and directed to be certified to him for due observance thereof. We assume it will not be necessary to issue a formal writ.

Messrs. F. B. Grier, W. E. Kay, and Robert C. Alston for petitioner.

Case Details

Case Name: Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 20, 1929
Citation: 279 U.S. 822
Docket Number: No. 19, original
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.