History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ex Parte Andre Bailey v. the State of Texas
14-20-00837-CR
| Tex. App. | Jun 22, 2021
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 22, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00837-CR EX PARTE ANDRE BAILEY On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2324058 MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal of a denial of habeas-corpus relief. The trial

court’s judgment states that habeas-corpus relief was denied because the original case was dismissed.

A habeas-corpus applicant must be illegally restrained to be entitled to relief. Ex Parte Weise , 55 S.W.3d 617, 619 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). When appellant’s underlying charge was dismissed his habeas-corpus proceeding was rendered moot. “The longstanding rule in Texas regarding habeas corpus is that where the premise of a habeas corpus application is destroyed by subsequent developments, *2 the legal issues thereunder are moot.” Ex parte Guerrero , 99 S.W.3d 852, 853 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted) (mem. op.). On May 6, 2021, this court transmitted notice to all parties of the court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s response failed to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

2

Case Details

Case Name: Ex Parte Andre Bailey v. the State of Texas
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 22, 2021
Docket Number: 14-20-00837-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.