Everett v. StateEverett v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
[¶1] Stanton Quilt appeals from a trial court order denying his request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Quilt argues the trial court erred in finding he has a congenital or acquired condition that is manifested by a sexual disorder, personality disorder, or other mental disorder or dysfunction; is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct; and has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. We conclude the trial court‘s decision is supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner