History
  • No items yet
midpage
Everett v. State
112 Tex. Crim. 339
Tex. Crim. App.
1929
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

Upon his plea of guilty appellant was given the punishment mentioned. There is in the record no statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The judgment and sentence are in conformity with the law.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed. *Page 340

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.






Addendum

Appellant predicates a motion for rehearing upon the contention that the indictment is duplicitous, thereby for the first time raising such question. We see no defect in the indictment in the particular mentioned. Even if it were vulnerable to such attack it comes too late after verdict. Melley v. State, 93 Tex.Crim. Rep., 248 S.W. 367; Garner v. State, 100 Tex.Crim. Rep., 272 S.W. 167; Ramsey v. State, 108 Tex.Crim. Rep., 299 S.W. 411.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Everett v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 3, 1929
Citation: 112 Tex. Crim. 339
Docket Number: No. 12523.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.