History
  • No items yet
midpage
Everdyke v. Esley
15 N.Y.S.2d 666
N.Y. App. Div.
1939
Check Treatment

Judgment and order reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appeEants to abide the event. Memorandum: The court erred in not permitting proof of the conviction of the plaintiff. (Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co., 258 N. Y. 310; Matter of Rechtschaffen, 278 id. 336.) AE concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a civE action for assault. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Everdyke v. Esley
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 10, 1939
Citation: 15 N.Y.S.2d 666
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.