53 Vt. 626 | Vt. | 1881
The opinion of the court was delivered by
In this case the court does not find occasion or need to review the cases involving questions as to expert testimony, either for the purpose of defining such testimony, or of stating the rules to which it is subjected in application.
To the extent to which the witness testified as an expert, as the court understand and construe the exceptions, objection seems hardly to be made in the argument. Plaintiff’s counsel seems to regard the exceptions as presenting the witness, testifying as an expert, “ whether the horse was too smoothly shod to properly
The naked fact of the dullness of the corks would not, under the circumstances, be conclusive on that subject. The circumstances attending such dullness might be necessary in order to have it appear whether that dullness was the result of negligence in that