History
  • No items yet
midpage
Evans v. State
135 S.W.2d 121
Tex. Crim. App.
1940
Check Treatment

The offense is forgery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

There is a fatal variance between the purport and tenor clauses of the indictment. In the purport clause it is alleged that appellant made a false instrument in writing purporting to be the act of J. E. Masters, Sr. The alleged forged instrument, as set out in the indictment, is signed "Edd Masters." The indictment embraces no innuendo averments explaining the connection between J. E. Masters, Sr., and Edd Masters. See Simms v. State, 32 S.W.2d 852. The State's Attorney before this Court confesses error.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Evans v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 3, 1940
Citation: 135 S.W.2d 121
Docket Number: No. 20727.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.