Evans v. SandovalEvans v. Sandoval
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In light of the lack of prejudice to the plaintiff resulting from the respondent’s short delay in answering the complaint, the lack of willfulness on the part of the respondent, the existence of a potentially meritorious defense, and the public policy favoring the resolution of cases on the merits, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to
DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.