Evans v. GoordEvans v. Goord
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating facility visiting procedures, creating a disturbance, harassment and refusing a direct order in violation of prison disciplinary rules. We confirm. The misbehavior report with a
Petitioner‘s procedural objections are unpersuasive. The record demonstrates that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and the determination did not flow from any bias on the part of the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Cayenne v Goord, 16 AD3d 782, 783-784 [2005]). Petitioner‘s remaining contentions, to the extent preserved, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.
Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.