History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eustace v. Tuthill
2 Johns. 185
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1807
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In the case of Heaton v. Ferris,* which was an action of trespass, the defendant pleaded the general issue, and a special justification of a right of way by prescription over the locus in quo, and it was decided that the plaintiff was entitled to full costs. The present case comes within the principle there decided. The plaintiff must have his full costs.

Vol. 1. 146. Feb. 1806.

Case Details

Case Name: Eustace v. Tuthill
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1807
Citation: 2 Johns. 185
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.