Eubanks v. Stengel
224 F.3d 576
6th Cir.2000Check TreatmentDocket
OPINION
After reviewing the briefs and the record and having heard oral argument, we held this case in abeyance pending the decision by the United States Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart, — U.S. -,
After carefully reviewing the decision in Carhart we conclude that it is controlling in this case, and that the district court was correct when it held that the Kentucky statute is unconstitutional.
AFFIRMED.
