History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eubanks v. Stengel
224 F.3d 576
6th Cir.
2000
Check Treatment
Docket

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and the record and having heard oral argument, we held this case in abeyance pending the decision by the United States Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2597, 147 L.Ed.2d 743 (2000). The appeal in Carhart involved a challenge to Nebraska’s partial birth abortion statute and presented issues very similar to those involved in this challenge to the Kentucky partial birth abortion statute.

After carefully reviewing the decision in Carhart we conclude that it is controlling in this case, and that the district court was correct when it held that the Kentucky statute is unconstitutional.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Eubanks v. Stengel
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 31, 2000
Citation: 224 F.3d 576
Docket Number: No. 98-6671
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In