History
  • No items yet
midpage
Etlin v. Etlin
495 U.S. 945
SCOTUS
1990
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Ct. App. Va. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 11, 1990, within which to *946pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Case Details

Case Name: Etlin v. Etlin
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 21, 1990
Citation: 495 U.S. 945
Docket Number: No. 89-7069
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.