Estrada v. Avalon Health Care Hearthstone LLCEstrada v. Avalon Health Care Hearthstone LLC
ORDER
AIKEN, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R“) filed by Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke. ECF No. 324. Judge Clarke recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Certification of Order for Interlocutory Appeal Under
For those portions of a magistrate judge‘s findings and recommendations to which neither party has objected, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate‘s report to which no objections are filed.“). Although no review is required in the absence of objections, the Magistrates Act “does not preclude further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” Id. at 154. The Advisory Committee Notes to
In this case, no party has filed objections to the F&R. The Court has reviewed Judge Clarke‘s recommendations and finds no error. The F&R is ADOPTED.
CONCLUSION
Judge Clarke‘s Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 324, is ADOPTED. As set forth in the F&R, Defendants’ Motion for Certification of Order for Interlocutory Appeal and for Partial Stay, ECF No. 299, is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED and DATED this 1st day of September 2026.
ANN AIKEN
United States District Judge