| Iowa | Apr 4, 1895
I. Plaintiffs sued upon a contract for the balance of the purchase price of a piano, and asked the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage thereon. Defendants denied all of the allegations of the petition, denied any indebtedness, admitted executing the contract, and
■ II. The judgment below must be affirmed. The assignments of error raise no question for our consideration. They are: First. The court erred in sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiffs’ reply; second, the court erred in entering judgment against the appellants and in favor of the appellees for costs; and third, the court erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ petition. The statute requires that assignments of error shall specify the error relied upon. The demurrer containéd five-distinct grounds. The assignments do not point out any particular ground as error. Such an assignment is not good. Duncombe v. Powers, 75 Iowa, 185" court="Iowa" date_filed="1888-09-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/duncombe-v-powers-7103506?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7103506">75 Iowa, 185; Kirk v. Litterst, 71 Iowa, 71" court="Iowa" date_filed="1887-03-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/kirk-v-litterst-7102557?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7102557">71 Iowa, 71; Town of Waukon v. Strouse, 74 Iowa, 547" court="Iowa" date_filed="1888-05-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/town-of-waukon-v-strouse-7103383?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7103383">74 Iowa, 547. It will be observed that the last two assignments do not cure the defect.— Affirmed.. .