History
  • No items yet
midpage
Esters v. State
308 So. 2d 742
Ala. Crim. App.
1975
Check Treatment

Appeal from revocation of probation. See Sparks v. State,40 Ala. App. 551, 119 So.2d 596, which requires assignments of error. Supreme Court Rule 52 does not excuse the lack of assignments except in appeals from ordinance violations. Additionally, appellant's counsel has filed a no-merit letter.

No errors having been assigned, nothing is presented for review. See the numerous annotations appended to Supreme Court Rule 1 in Michie's 1958 Code, T. 7.

Where there is no final judgment a purported appeal is due to be dismissed. McKinley v. Morris, 280 Ala. 408, 194 So.2d 565. Here there is a final judgment placing in execution the sentence originally pronounced. In such a case the judgment below is due to be affirmed. Dobson v. *Page 384 Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764; Nichol v. Hardegree,202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Esters v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Feb 18, 1975
Citation: 308 So. 2d 742
Docket Number: 1 Div. 533
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.