216 Wis. 462 | Wis. | 1934
The claimant, a son of Filippina Goyk, claims to have performed services for his mother while a member of her household on the promise that the real estate owned by her would be given to him upon her death. The agreement was not in writing. The services began in 1906. He also claims to have advanced cash and to have paid the taxes in the years 1914 and 1916. He kept no records. In giving his testimony he relies entirely upon his memory as to the character of the services rendered, the time of their performance, and their value. His mother died August 15, 1931. Such an agreement having been made, it would constitute sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that the services were rendered gratuitously. Estate of Goltz, 205
The claimant urges that because of the failure on the part of the executrix to plead the statute of limitations, she cannot rely upon that defense. But sufficient answer to that contention may be found in sec. 313.05, Stats., which requires that the county court disallow claims barred by the statute of limitations. Dreger v. Tarrant, 165 Wis. 414, 162 N. W. 481; Murtha v. Donohoo, 149 Wis. 481, 134 N. W. 406, 136 N. W. 158; 4 Bryant’s Wis. Pl. & Pr. (Boesel & Henderson ed.), p. 365, § 704.
There are no facts established which are capable of supporting a finding of any amount due claimant from his mother for services rendered within six years of her death.
By the Court. — Judgment reversed upon the appeal of the executrix, and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the claim.
