History
  • No items yet
midpage
Escalona v. Kersten
682 So. 2d 223
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1996
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Felix Escalona appeals from a final order of the trial court which dismissed the second amended complaint for lack of prosecution. It is conceded that Escalona filed a notice of hearing on Jones’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint within the one year period established by the Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e), and we find that the filing of a notice of hearing is record activity within the meaning of the rule. Heinz v. Watson, 615 So.2d 750, 753 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 624 So.2d 266 (Fla.1993).

The omission of the date in the certificate of service was not so egregious as to render the certificate a nullity in this instance.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Case Details

Case Name: Escalona v. Kersten
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 6, 1996
Citation: 682 So. 2d 223
Docket Number: No. 96-579
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.