History
  • No items yet
midpage
Esaw Lampkin v. State
06-14-00024-CR
| Tex. App. | Jun 25, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 | (1) | DAR&-15-2DF&5D IN | | :--: | :--: | | (2) The APPELlANZCompelain that there are W1. | The Court of Appeals | | Reversal. IssUEs To Re iLlEqally Raise on | Sixth District | | APELal subiected to HARm A nalysis | JUN 252015 | | Reviellconstitutional HARm A nalysis And | Texarkana, Texas | | BURSHAP To Tex R. APP. P 44181 Because | Debra K. Autrey, Clerk | | The APPELlote RecoROS in A criminal | TrialCALS ENO. | | COSE Revals Constitucional ERRORS. | | | 4.CampElant DEqUESS issUEs To Re Rqible | Because APPEllant COURAPEauted COUSSE | | 10.AAreement With, The state, that The | | | had a True seAlch wlARRans to Grand Al | | | Blood sample HOWEUEA there No TRIal | | | RePORDS. of That EXhigly staEER IN The | | | APPELlens' mbSione to ABASE APEeal | |

*2 (5) Camelaiol of canf ERROR Date of Trial

Theces NO RecORO OF A Exhibit Filed or included search wARRant Evidence From the state included in the reportERS RECOURS Amitted into Evidence of A PROOF.

2.1ESiom From APEtIeat to the caUts can A Exhibit After age Person Trial is over Be Admitted. IN A SUPPLEMENTAL RECORO REPORTERS RECORD

(6) Camelaiol of A misconduct court ERRORS boulis if thas the area canuy eavt officialis. IN The 124TH.TiDicial District Didnot Amite so True search wARRANT At Date of Trial

Are A RecoSnizable and return Date of d 1 time. OF Properly Fiins, it is A material Fact Viesting of Law issues As A whole. The misconduct of state officials resultep in HARM APPEtleat Procedure his. C. 1] consf Ameads 6 UY) VERONDS AND SINAS Consi ARS (1.3.18) A Chailenaios PartY cIV Proc aule 327 A) (7) The state in eiad c ossept stature gives A Person A Tight in ReEise an officials. APAURS To Provide a Bl ooo sample ARS 224.015 of the TEADAS SCASSPATtation code. and the anly e Xception To Focable SAKE A) 11000.5 Pecimen DIFR A REEise chaffen Y9 Penal code Yeaspectation cade if A Person was 10 Volved in AD ACCident the official. Filed To meet the Four requirements in the TEADAS Yeaspectation cade. So FOCABly withd casl APPEtleat Bl000 A Fourth Amendment Violation of His Castitutionel 01965

*3

(3) Grounds of Relief and canalaiot

Aprellant Conssivational Rights was so indeed violated of the unifed states Against. Inceasonable seaches and seizures there was no path of the affirmation

9) Aprellant was slamed face down an right shoulder on to a hospital and with the handcuffs behind my back stust Because I refused the conceait to Allows a Blood SamHe Because the seach wasant was no good was not intent of No Vracif Record of All stude

10) I Receive A1 99 Year seataace in A state Prison I was not promising an ORIVINY I didnot Hove A Fair Public Trial. YOR did I REqUEY For A Trial I REques the A change of Venue From out of the Cross country because could not Receive A Fair Trial. The could seant one to trial against my fee-will the Aprellant Trial coulds REqores reflect. Aconids. canalaiot of the could officiess of Cross country in the 129th District cones. was Visitation of my consisiyation Rights ceave A Fair Trial I didnot Reques A Ties. Trial

11) THE Admission of Evidence obtained in Visitation of the Fourth Amendment is subject to the conssivational Harm Analysis Important To To Yed Re APE P 44 (2) Recong Revals EREon A Aprellant could miss Reverse Judgment or Consivsivm. Harmless EREon in 9 uikV under APE P Rule 44 (2) s E EALrachment P28E

*4 NO. 0614 . 0024 . C R IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THESIXTH APPLIAMED DISSEICT AT TEAMBKANN ESAU LAMPKINPROSE Trial CAUSENO: 42.897-R

V6. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN A AWCORW AFFIDAYt SIAVEMENEE HEREIN I APPLLIANT ESAU LAMPKIN PRoSE State on the oate of poy illegal I WAS inlbandcuFE aad illegally Eobcee 3UESTIGO To Adarit To The State VROBEA Thar I DRAVK Thre Natural I 19hts BeEAs when I didnot and on A filed. VESG He didnot at all uabandruFE me in PeCform the Vialkin and YRUW NDR The one 1899 Stand. Eobce Al 10 W D I po me while I WAS Alnegdy Place under ARRess in HandcuFf FAR A 3001 EN TRLCK which I didnot. Still. ony Freedon of molement WAS indeed RestrictED Didpot Hove A Eaig chaoge. To FROVE To the OFEiER Thar I APPLIIANT WAS Not OcarICTNS AND DRIKINg Filed. To Read To me my constitutional I 19hts. To Remain SITENT NOR did I WALVE MY RIShts oUFA the State VROBEA, OEAW BEFA 3UESTIGNING Dean Violateded ony FicTh Amendments constitutional R 19hts illegally 3UESTIGNING aad ony toutheeofh Amendament RISMS under Proceedure OUE Process Filed To allow To Freely opoye. YNE one 1 e9-STAND AND WASHN and YRUW. While ony freedom of mement WAS RestrictED UNFAIR Proceedure to awtomPRoSE 1912325

*5

DAVRE-15-2015

CEAVIFICATE of DEEIVERY

I hecebY certify tha a true of this camel aint age been so mailed to the sixth courive of ateals DISTRICT. of Texas Bi-state Justice upnolorth state line Avenue 20 Vedapkara. Texas 750al Place 10to the Prison Legal mail Box at the of FROBMS USIV 9601 SPINS 91 AMARiID. TEdas 79109

Case Details

Case Name: Esaw Lampkin v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 25, 2015
Docket Number: 06-14-00024-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.